|
Loyalty Articles |
Article
#1
Nordstrom upgrades loyalty program experience
DM News, US |

|
- The average U.S.
household belongs to 12 customer loyalty programs. As a
result, leading retailers are revamping their retention
efforts to stand out from the crowd. Virgin Megastores
VIP Program is one of them.
- The total number of U.S.
loyalty memberships in 2006 was 1.319 billion, up from
973 million in 2000.
- Major Retailers are
finding that they can no longer provide merely a basic
rewards program.
- The Retail Industry is
seeing a number of leading brands embracing experiential
rewards as an opportunity to expand their portfolio of
award offerings, differentiate themselves from
competitors, and create more significant and memorable
interactions with their customers.
- Virgin Megastores know
that customers are looking for great experiences that
money can't buy, consequently this is the formula
injected into their new V.I.P. loyalty program.
- Companies are
experiencing more sales as a result of incorporating
loyalty into their overall marketing plan.
With the average U.S.
household belonging to 12 customer loyalty programs, many
best-of-breed retailers are revamping their retention
efforts in order to stand out from the crowd.
Nordstrom, which launched a
new loyalty program in April, is just the latest
multichannel merchant to realize that offering cash back on
purchases to frequent customers isn't enough to build the
elusive quality of “loyalty.” Instead, Nordstrom's new
program lets customers design private shopping trips to
Chicago or San Francisco and gives them access to a 24-hour
fashion emergency hotline, among other privileges.
The new loyalty program “puts
Nordstrom in the Neiman Marcus category,” said Michael
Greenberg, vice president of marketing at Loyalty Lab Inc.,
San Francisco.
Neiman Marcus' renowned
InCircle program is 25 years old and considered the gold
standard of customer loyalty programs with offers such as
the Condé Nast experience. In addition to hotel and airfare,
it includes lunch at the Condé Nast headquarters in New
York, a visit to the Vogue fashion closet, a private tour of
the Metropolitan Museum of Art Costume Institute's fashion
exhibit and a $500 shopping spree at Bergdorf Goodman.
“[Major retailers] can no
longer go with a basic rewards program — they have to add
experiential benefits to stay ahead of all the other options
that are in the marketplace,” Mr. Greenberg said.
He said many more retailers
have formal loyalty programs today than two years ago.
According to a new report from customer loyalty research
firm Colloquy, the total number of U.S. loyalty memberships
in 2006 was 1.319 billion, up from 973 million in 2000.
Nordstrom isn't the only one
looking to up the ante on its loyalty program. Saks Fifth
Avenue, Borders and Best Buy have all recently revamped
their programs, adding new exclusive privileges.
Still another reason for the
increase in experiential benefits is that, thanks to all
that competition among loyalty programs, savvy consumers are
learning to expect more from the businesses with which they
interact.
“What we're finding is that
what the customer is really looking for is great experiences
that money can't buy,” said Roger Ritchie, senior marketing
manager for Virgin Entertainment Group and manager of the
company's new V.I.P. loyalty program.
The program, which was
introduced in October and replaced a frequency card program
that offered cash back on merchandise, gives customers the
opportunity to meet celebrities in Virgin Megastores and
earn backstage passes to concerts and instant prizes when
they use their card.
“When customers get these kinds of opportunities, it is
worth something to them,” Mr. Ritchie said. “We've found it
to be totally worth the investment — the program is doing
well.”
He said Virgin hopes to build
its customer base with the program.
Retailers are also turning their attention to retention.
Customer acquisition is increasingly more expensive thanks
to the rising cost of search engine marketing and postage.
At the same time, the cost of launching and managing a
customer loyalty program has declined, Mr. Greenberg said.
But is the promise of meeting
Paul McCartney or being able to shop for exclusive fashions
enough to make consumers use their loyalty cards more?
According to the Colloquy's report, of the 12 loyalty cards
that the average U.S. household belongs to, only 4.7 percent
of them are active.
Kelly Hlavinka, director of
Colloquy, Milford, OH, thinks that Nordstrom loyalty program
will benefit from the new offerings, especially because the
retailer hasn't completely done away with more traditional
rewards the earning of points that can be used toward the
purchase of any Nordstrom product or service.
“When operators blend hard benefits and soft benefits
together, that's where we see better participation rates,”
Ms. Hlavinka said.
For example, in a recent case
study with a multichannel retailer, the blend of hard and
soft benefits results in a 10 percent increase in annual
customer value over the market where the loyalty program
offered only exclusive privileges. A 2 percent to 3 percent
increase was seen over the market where only rewards were
offered.
The retailer's level of
commitment to the program, and not just the offerings, also
help determine its success.
“There are companies that are
doing more sales from loyalty programs and it is usually
companies that have incorporated loyalty into their overall
marketing,” said Mr. Greenberg.
Senior Editor Chantal Todé
covers catalog and retail news and BTB marketing for DM News
and DM News.com. |
|
|
Back to
top |
|
| |
| |
|
|
- Tesco launched its Clubcard, the UK's first
nationwide supermarket-only loyalty card scheme, in 1995.
Tesco's clubcard is the greatest proof of how customer
intelligence can add significant value to a retail business.
- Without sufficient knowledge of their
customers' behaviors and buying habits, many large scale
retailers are doomed to failure. Retailers are continually
recognising that customer intelligence is a key factor in
differentiating winners from the losers in the retail sector.
- Information about what Tesco customers spend,
what they eat and how they shop is being collected through
Tesco's loyalty schemes in order to build up a profile of
customer habits. This customer data has helped Tesco to
understand what their customer is after, and replace intuition
with actual data and actual facts. And it's those facts that are
driving large retail chains decision making.
Everybody knows that knowledge is power so it
seems strange that many retailers seem to have little insight into
their customers. But their interest is growing as they increasingly
recognise customer intelligence is now a key factor in
differentiating winners from the losers in the retail sector. An
example of how important it has become (in all parts of the business
world) is the recent Business Week ‘Best Performers 2007' survey.
This concluded that the key distinguishing factor of many companies
in the top 50 was a deep understanding of their customers.
This gave them the competitive advantage to sell
more goods and services than their rivals. And nobody would argue
that the likes of Google, Goldman Sachs and Amazon, which finished
high in the list, are exemplars in using customer knowledge to drive
sales.
Nowhere is the increased desire for customer
insight more evident than in the ultra-competitive food retailing
sector. So much so in fact that even the mighty Wal-Mart is in the
midst of jumping onboard.
As the creator of the long-standing Every Day Low
Prices
(EDLP) strategy (that was pretty much adopted by all retailers
around the globe in recent years) it believed that all it needed to
attract customers was low prices.
But it now realises this view was wrong and that
its myopic focus has limited its business development. For a company
not keen on showing any signs of weakness it was pretty open in
admitting that it had to become more
Customer-focused: "Broad stroke ‘Always Low Prices' has not allowed
us to develop some of the businesses to their full potential,
because that doesn't resonate with the customers."
Nowhere has Wal-Mart seen greater proof of how
customer intelligence can add significant value to a retail business
than with Tesco. For some years the Wal-Mart owned Asda has been
losing ground to Tesco in the UK as it increasingly capitalises on
its extensive customer knowledge to drive sales harder and move into
new categories.
It's fair to say that Tesco's insight into its
customers is regarded as second to none in the retail world. And
what makes this possible is marketing data specialist Dunnhumby (of
which Tesco owns 83%). So successful is it that the company has also
sold its services to Kroger a US-based supermarket and general store
business that operates over 2,500 outlets that trade under a variety
of fascias including Fred Meyer, Kroger and Dillons and also to
leading French supermarket operator Groupe Casino.
It has helped Kroger to stage a recovery against
Wal-Mart after a long period of losing ground. Unsurprisingly, its
smaller scale meant it was unable to fight on an equal footing with
Wal-Mart using an EDLP strategy. It has been using Dunnhumby's
expertise with customer data to segment
- or tailor - its stores to their specific local markets.
The Kroger chairman and chief executive David
Dillon has described the data company as his secret weapon in
fighting Wal-Mart: "Dunnhumby has helped me reset my understanding
of what the customer is after, and it helps replace intuition with
actual data and actual facts. And it's those facts that are driving
our decision making."
Dunnhumby analyses the sales data from stores to
enable it to construct complex marketing strategies and promotional
campaigns. This essential information on actual buying behaviour has
guided most of the key decisions taken by the management team at
Tesco in recent years (such as the launches of both Tesco.com and
its financial services arm, and its entry into non-food categories
such as clothing). It will increasingly have the same effect on
Kroger and will likely do the same for Casino in the future (the
link-up was only announced in October 2006).
What makes is possible to enjoy such customer
insight from the data analysis at these retailers are their loyalty
schemes through which they are able to collect personal details on
their customers and to link this with the purchases that they make
in-store. Such loyalty schemes have not been regarded as
particularly good ideas to date and Tesco has received much
criticism about its loyalty program since its launch in 1995. They
were just seen as a cost on a business since they would reduce
margin as customers collected points to redeem against goods or
money off their shopping bills. David Sainsbury infamously dismissed
it as "no better than electronic Green Shield stamps".
But he was to eat his words many times over
because since the first customer signed up to the scheme it has
provided much of the fuel that has powered Tesco to the top of the
UK retailing tree. It is no coincidence that since Tesco launched
the scheme it has overtaken Sainsbury's to become, by a long way,
the UK's largest retailer.
Within only a few months its impact was obvious.
Research showed that customers spent 28% more at Tesco while cutting
their spending at Sainsbury's by 16%. This had a major effect on the
market shares of the two companies with Sainsbury's having a 19.4%
share in January 1995 compared with Tesco on 18.1% but by May of
that year the formers share had slipped to 18.8% while the latter
had grabbed a 19.4% share. This trend has continued to this day and
Tesco now commands a 31.3% share against the 16.5% of Sainsbury's.
From day one Tesco knew that the scheme would provide a whole lot
more than simply allowing people to collect loyalty points to reduce
their shopping bill. In fact this was never the point of the
exercise because the point-accrual mechanism was simply the carrot
to customers that would get them to dig out their loyalty cards
whenever they visited a Tesco store, thereby enabling Tesco to
collect data on them.
But as other retailers launched their own loyalty
programs they soon recognised that collecting data is one thing but
making sense of it and transforming it into customer intelligence is
a completely different matter.
It was an inability to overcome this problem that
prompted Sainsbury's (yes it did ultimately launch a loyalty card
despite David Sainsbury), Safeway, Somerfield, Asda and Waitrose to
abandon their schemes one-by-one.
Just consider that even when Clubcard had a mere
five million cardholders, during a three-month trial of the scheme,
Tesco had to deal with 50 million shopping trips that comprised 50
billion purchased items. What made the analysis of this data
mountain possible was the decision by Dunnhumby to only analyse 10%
of the data and then apply the findings back to the other 90%. It
realised that even a 10% sample could give 90% accuracy whereas the
massively more complex and expensive task of analysing a much larger
percentage of data might only deliver 95% certainty so it came to
the conclusion that crunching any more than 10% of the numbers was
simply not worth the cost or effort.
So powerful were the findings from this trial
period that the then Tesco boss Ian MacLaurin said: "You know more
about my customers in three months than I know in 30 years." The
belief at Tesco was that if Dunnhumby could replicate the success
from the trial across the whole business then there was a chance
that it could propel the company to become the UK's number one food
retailer – displacing Sainsbury's. Since this has come to pass
Dunnhumby has played a serious part in customer intelligence
creeping up the agenda of an increasing number of retailers. They
have come to realise that without sufficient knowledge of their
customers' behaviour and buying habits then they are doomed to
failure.
A number of years ago I spoke with a former chief executive of
Wal-Mart and asked him whether the company – and its UK arm Asda –
would be likely to introduce a loyalty scheme to learn more about
its customers and he gave a categorical ‘no'. Although he was right
and neither company has launched such a scheme this is not to say
that they won't in the future. Especially as Wal-Mart will soon find
itself competing directly with Tesco on US soil as the UK
supermarket will shortly be opening a chain of ‘Fresh & Easy' shops
on the West Coast.
Ominously for Wal-Mart, the Tesco boss Sir Terry
Leahy recently stated that the company intended to roll out its
Clubcard scheme to each of the countries in which it operates
thereby throwing up the scenario where Wal-Mart could be facing the
might of Tesco's customer insight on its own doorstep.
But even if Wal-Mart resists committing to a scheme there is little
doubt that it is increasingly looking to learn more about its
customers having recognised that price in no longer the
be-all-and-end-all for consumers.
To this end last year it appointed a new head of
marketing who had previously spent 19 years at Target – which is
recognised as very proficient in targeting segments of customers
through focused marketing made possible by customer insight. Target
has proved itself particularly adept at extracting more money out of
its customers by targeting them more effectively through knowledge
of their behaviour, thereby achieving higher profits out of its
existing stores. Target's business is regarded as the ‘up market
discounter' in the US.
Wal-Mart is now attempting to follow the same
path. Its new marketing man has set up a market research and
consumer insights competency that is intended to help the company
adopt a marketing approach that focuses on specific categories. This
will help it to introduce new categories and better tailor the mix
of goods in each of its stores so they are better suited to their
location and customer bases.
There is evidence that retailers are using various
methods to boost their customer knowledge without necessarily
running their own loyalty scheme. The multi- retailer loyalty
program Nectar is one example of how retailers have been able to
increase their customer knowledge without running their own scheme.
In the UK Nectar has signed up some serious retail names including
Sainsbury's, Debenhams and Dollond & Aitchison but although it
provides the mechanism for cardholders to collect and redeem points
it is nowhere near as effective at providing customer insight as
Dunnhumby is for Tesco and Kroger.
To address the increasing demand for such insight
Nectar is now working on creating a data analytics division (a la
Dunnhumby) that will enable it to make much better sense of the mass
of data that it collects each day on behalf of its retail clients.
Tesco has successfully used market intelligence to steal a march on
its competitors who are now belatedly waking up to its potential.
By Glynn Davis for The Daily Reckoning. You can
read more from Glynn and many others at
www.dailyreckoning.co.uk
Editor's note: Glynn Davis is retail and leisure
correspondent for The Fleet Street Letter. He also writes for The
Grocer magazine, Retail Week and several national newspapers. |
|
Back to top |
|
| |
| |
Article
#3
The Problem with Loyalty Programs
Business Week, By Steve McKee
May 10, 2007 |
 |
|
- The share of a customer's heart
is as important as their share of wallet. Steve McKee declares
that if loyalty measures behavior, equity measures attitudes.
Properly balanced, loyalty should increase equity and equity
should drive loyalty. However these are not the same.
- David Briggs, CEO of American
retailing giant QVC, stated “We don't bombard customers with
special offer or coupons to build loyalty…we focus on customer
communication and satisfaction. For us, it's about building
trust and a long-term relationship.
- There are four basic behaviors
of loyal customers: They return for more, they increase their
purchases, they bring their friends, and ultimately they invest
their valuable time for free.
- A large majority of loyalty
programs believe that if you focus on share of heart, you will
get share of wallet. The reverse may not always be true.
Companies measure customer commitment
by their transactions.
But that often has little to do with how people genuinely feel about
the business
From the earliest days of commerce, merchants have rewarded their
most loyal customers with perks—from the baker's dozen to S&H Green
Stamps. But in the modern era, customer-loyalty programs become an
industry all their own.
We owe that to American Airlines
(AMR). Kick-started by the 1981 advent of American's AAdvantage
program, total U.S. consumer membership in loyalty-marketing
programs today is more than 1 billion strong—an average of more than
four programs per adult. Nearly 90% of Americans participate in some
type of rewards program, and most are enrolled in more than one.
But are loyalty programs really all
they're cracked up to be? Sure, they generate incremental
transactions, but what happens to loyalty when the loyalty program
stops? Do these programs generate true loyalty or just behavior that
looks like loyalty?
It's kind of frightening that we can
be reduced as consumers to the sum of what's in our wallet. I
emptied my own pocket and found that I carry seven cards from
companies that track and reward my purchase behavior.
Fuzzy Picture
I feel genuine loyalty to three of those brands. Two others capture
many of my transactions not because of any loyalty I feel but simply
because of the benefits they give me. And two I use occasionally
because I have a lot invested in them—given the way they've treated
me over the years, they actually elicit mild contempt from me each
time I do. Not exactly what the loyalty program is designed to
generate.
And that's my point: If each of these
marketers judged my loyalty strictly by my behavior, they're going
to the wrong idea about why I'm loyal. That's the problem with
loyalty programs.
Fred Reichheld is an expert on
loyalty marketing and the author of The Ultimate Question (Harvard
Business School Press, 2006). He cites the example of a grocery
store that mistakenly thinks its regular customers are loyal, when
in fact they hate the store and shop there only because it's
convenient (see BusinessWeek.com, 1/30/06, "Would You Recommend
Us?"). Using data alone, he says, "It's hard to tell a good
transactional customer from somebody who's a true promoter." He's
right.
Matters of the Heart
"Loyalty," as it's defined in practice by loyalty marketing
programs, is primarily a measure of behavior—share of wallet, if you
will. But making decisions by share of wallet alone is a dangerous
game.
Think about a company's most active
loyalty marketing program members. It's possible that many of them
are the least genuinely "loyal" customers the company has. As the
data flows in and the company increasingly tailors the program
toward those whose behavior can be bought, it may be neglecting
truly loyal customers who don't need to be bribed.
I would like to suggest that at least
as important as share of wallet is share of heart, or what might be
termed "equity." If loyalty measures behavior, equity measures
attitudes. Properly balanced, loyalty should increase equity and
equity should drive loyalty. But they're not the same thing.
Loyalty is how I relate to American
Airlines and Hilton (HLN). I use both companies frequently, for
reasons of calculated benefit more than any long-term affection. In
contrast, equity is how I relate to Southwest Airlines (LUV) and
Hertz (HTZ)—I would do business with them whether or not they gave
me any points or miles. Which two companies are better off with
respect to my long-term profitability?
Equity Leaders
Reichheld says there are four basic behaviors of loyal customers:
They come back for more, they increase their purchases, they bring
their friends, and they invest their precious time for free (see
BusinessWeek.com, 8/1/06, "What Not to Do with Net Promoter"). Most
loyalty program managers no doubt think their programs pass these
four measures. But in my mind, it's those last two words that make
all the difference: for free.
Consider your political party. If
you're like most people, you've been a member of the same political
party for years. You almost always vote for its candidates, you have
probably donated money to it, and you may have even volunteered your
precious time—yes, for free. Political parties have equity.
Now make a list of your favorite
brands. You pay more for them, go out of your way to acquire them,
and recommend them to your friends—all for free. Every brand has
some level of equity, but some have more than others. And the key to
boosting equity is to increase affection—the feeling that drives
behavior rather than just the behavior itself.
The Wrong Road
Doug Briggs, former president and CEO of QVC, had the right idea:
"We don't bombard customers with special offers or coupons to build
loyalty, because it's easy for them to switch to the other guy's
coupon. We focus on customer communication and satisfaction. For us,
it's about building trust and developing long-term relationships. If
QVC has earned a customer's trust, we believe they will buy—over and
over again."
I think many companies have gone too far down the road of focusing
on loyalty at the expense of equity. Loyalty is admirable, but it
can also be a burden. I'm so afraid of forgetting about or losing
the rewards I've "earned" that it's just one more burden I have to
deal with. But affection is always positive.
If you focus on share of heart, you
will get share of wallet. The reverse may not always be true. |
|
Back to top |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| A recent study into the shopping
habits of loyalty enrolees supports the prominent notion that
loyalty program members spend more than their fellow non-member
customers. 58% of enrolees from
the study group of holiday makers stated that memberships influenced
where and how they shopped. Furthermore, the demographics that
correlate with higher incomes also link to loyalty program
participants.
Loyalty program members accounted for
48 percent of holiday shoppers in 2006. Two-thirds of loyalty
members shopped online, and 41 percent ordered from a catalog or
through the mail.
Ultimately, loyalty program members
are more likely to provide recommendations, especially about
programs they do business with.
Retailers sensing that members of
their loyalty programs are more valuable customers now have hard
facts to back up their gut instincts. According to a survey of
holiday spending, participants have more to spend -- and they do
spend it.
During the past holiday season,
loyalty scheme enrollees spent nearly $1200, or 14% more than other
consumers. That is, in part, because they have it: 24% have incomes
in excess of $100,000, compared with only 5% of non-enrollees.
But just because they have the higher incomes doesn't mean they are
averse to bargains, rewards and other perks: Nearly half of all
consumers who earn more than $50,000 "always" or "frequently" used
their loyalty cards in conjunction with holiday purchases. Among
those who made under $50,000, only 36% used their cards as often.
These programs exert a pull on
overall spending. Fifty-eight percent of enrollees said their
memberships influenced where they shopped -- and that figure jumped
to 62% among those who spent more than $1,000.
Loyalty scheme enrollees shop
throughout a number of channels. While nearly half of the
non-enrolled consumers did the vast majority of their shopping
exclusively in-store, less than one quarter of program participants
did so. Two-thirds also shopped online, 41% via the mail (both
catalog and direct mail) and one-third made purchases over the
phone.
The demographics that correlate with
higher incomes also link to loyalty program participants. These
consumers are more highly educated, and more are in their peak
earning years (between 30 and 60) than their counterparts. And women
were much more likely to cite the influence of loyalty programs than
men -- 63% of the fair sex indicated enrollment made an impact their
purchases, compared with 51% of males.
These results were based on a study
of 722 consumers. The study was conducted by Epsilon, a marketing
services firm. |
|
Back to top |
|
| |
|
|