Edition 2, May 2007
 
 
 

Welcome to the May 2007 edition of Loyalty Alerts, Visible Results'
e-newsletter for clients, partners and members of the public.

This edition looks at the success of Visible Results' Virgin Megastores VIP Program, as well as Greece's Notos Galleries More program.

As always, recently published, influential loyalty marketing articles are collated into a series of short executive summaries below.

Best regards and continue to keep your customers loyal.

 
 

Top Articles

 

VR Media Releases
Notos Galleries Launches New Rewards Program
Notos Galleries - Greece's preeminent department store - introduced their large scale customer loyalty program "Notos Galleries More" to customers on December 4th 2007

VR In The News
Virgin Plays Loyalty Tune. April 1st 2007. DIRECT Magazine
Virgin Megastores has created a rewards program that it hopes will stem music downloads and drive audiophiles into its North American shops.

retail

 

Loyalty Articles

   
Article #1
Nordstrom upgrades loyalty program experience
DM News, US

Nordstrom

  • The average U.S. household belongs to 12 customer loyalty programs. As a result, leading retailers are revamping their retention efforts to stand out from the crowd. Virgin Megastores VIP Program is one of them.
  • The total number of U.S. loyalty memberships in 2006 was 1.319 billion, up from 973 million in 2000.
  • Major Retailers are finding that they can no longer provide merely a basic rewards program.
  • The Retail Industry is seeing a number of leading brands embracing experiential rewards as an opportunity to expand their portfolio of award offerings, differentiate themselves from competitors, and create more significant and memorable interactions with their customers.
  • Virgin Megastores know that customers are looking for great experiences that money can't buy, consequently this is the formula injected into their new V.I.P. loyalty program.
  • Companies are experiencing more sales as a result of incorporating loyalty into their overall marketing plan.

With the average U.S. household belonging to 12 customer loyalty programs, many best-of-breed retailers are revamping their retention efforts in order to stand out from the crowd.

Nordstrom, which launched a new loyalty program in April, is just the latest multichannel merchant to realize that offering cash back on purchases to frequent customers isn't enough to build the elusive quality of “loyalty.” Instead, Nordstrom's new program lets customers design private shopping trips to Chicago or San Francisco and gives them access to a 24-hour fashion emergency hotline, among other privileges.

The new loyalty program “puts Nordstrom in the Neiman Marcus category,” said Michael Greenberg, vice president of marketing at Loyalty Lab Inc., San Francisco.

Neiman Marcus' renowned InCircle program is 25 years old and considered the gold standard of customer loyalty programs with offers such as the Condé Nast experience. In addition to hotel and airfare, it includes lunch at the Condé Nast headquarters in New York, a visit to the Vogue fashion closet, a private tour of the Metropolitan Museum of Art Costume Institute's fashion exhibit and a $500 shopping spree at Bergdorf Goodman.

“[Major retailers] can no longer go with a basic rewards program — they have to add experiential benefits to stay ahead of all the other options that are in the marketplace,” Mr. Greenberg said.

He said many more retailers have formal loyalty programs today than two years ago. According to a new report from customer loyalty research firm Colloquy, the total number of U.S. loyalty memberships in 2006 was 1.319 billion, up from 973 million in 2000.

Nordstrom isn't the only one looking to up the ante on its loyalty program. Saks Fifth Avenue, Borders and Best Buy have all recently revamped their programs, adding new exclusive privileges.

Still another reason for the increase in experiential benefits is that, thanks to all that competition among loyalty programs, savvy consumers are learning to expect more from the businesses with which they interact.

“What we're finding is that what the customer is really looking for is great experiences that money can't buy,” said Roger Ritchie, senior marketing manager for Virgin Entertainment Group and manager of the company's new V.I.P. loyalty program.

The program, which was introduced in October and replaced a frequency card program that offered cash back on merchandise, gives customers the opportunity to meet celebrities in Virgin Megastores and earn backstage passes to concerts and instant prizes when they use their card.
“When customers get these kinds of opportunities, it is worth something to them,” Mr. Ritchie said. “We've found it to be totally worth the investment — the program is doing well.”

He said Virgin hopes to build its customer base with the program.
Retailers are also turning their attention to retention. Customer acquisition is increasingly more expensive thanks to the rising cost of search engine marketing and postage. At the same time, the cost of launching and managing a customer loyalty program has declined, Mr. Greenberg said.

But is the promise of meeting Paul McCartney or being able to shop for exclusive fashions enough to make consumers use their loyalty cards more? According to the Colloquy's report, of the 12 loyalty cards that the average U.S. household belongs to, only 4.7 percent of them are active.

Kelly Hlavinka, director of Colloquy, Milford, OH, thinks that Nordstrom loyalty program will benefit from the new offerings, especially because the retailer hasn't completely done away with more traditional rewards the earning of points that can be used toward the purchase of any Nordstrom product or service.
“When operators blend hard benefits and soft benefits together, that's where we see better participation rates,” Ms. Hlavinka said.

For example, in a recent case study with a multichannel retailer, the blend of hard and soft benefits results in a 10 percent increase in annual customer value over the market where the loyalty program offered only exclusive privileges. A 2 percent to 3 percent increase was seen over the market where only rewards were offered.

The retailer's level of commitment to the program, and not just the offerings, also help determine its success.

“There are companies that are doing more sales from loyalty programs and it is usually companies that have incorporated loyalty into their overall marketing,” said Mr. Greenberg.

Senior Editor Chantal Todé covers catalog and retail news and BTB marketing for DM News and DM News.com.

Back to top

 
 
Article #2
How Tesco became Britain's top Supermarket
Money Week, 9th May
Tesco
  • Tesco launched its Clubcard, the UK's first nationwide supermarket-only loyalty card scheme, in 1995. Tesco's clubcard is the greatest proof of how customer intelligence can add significant value to a retail business.
  • Without sufficient knowledge of their customers' behaviors and buying habits, many large scale retailers are doomed to failure. Retailers are continually recognising that customer intelligence is a key factor in differentiating winners from the losers in the retail sector.
  • Information about what Tesco customers spend, what they eat and how they shop is being collected through Tesco's loyalty schemes in order to build up a profile of customer habits. This customer data has helped Tesco to understand what their customer is after, and replace intuition with actual data and actual facts. And it's those facts that are driving large retail chains decision making.

Everybody knows that knowledge is power so it seems strange that many retailers seem to have little insight into their customers. But their interest is growing as they increasingly recognise customer intelligence is now a key factor in differentiating winners from the losers in the retail sector. An example of how important it has become (in all parts of the business world) is the recent Business Week ‘Best Performers 2007' survey. This concluded that the key distinguishing factor of many companies in the top 50 was a deep understanding of their customers.

This gave them the competitive advantage to sell more goods and services than their rivals. And nobody would argue that the likes of Google, Goldman Sachs and Amazon, which finished high in the list, are exemplars in using customer knowledge to drive sales.

Nowhere is the increased desire for customer insight more evident than in the ultra-competitive food retailing sector. So much so in fact that even the mighty Wal-Mart is in the midst of jumping onboard.

As the creator of the long-standing Every Day Low Prices
(EDLP) strategy (that was pretty much adopted by all retailers around the globe in recent years) it believed that all it needed to attract customers was low prices.

But it now realises this view was wrong and that its myopic focus has limited its business development. For a company not keen on showing any signs of weakness it was pretty open in admitting that it had to become more
Customer-focused: "Broad stroke ‘Always Low Prices' has not allowed us to develop some of the businesses to their full potential, because that doesn't resonate with the customers."

Nowhere has Wal-Mart seen greater proof of how customer intelligence can add significant value to a retail business than with Tesco. For some years the Wal-Mart owned Asda has been losing ground to Tesco in the UK as it increasingly capitalises on its extensive customer knowledge to drive sales harder and move into new categories.

It's fair to say that Tesco's insight into its customers is regarded as second to none in the retail world. And what makes this possible is marketing data specialist Dunnhumby (of which Tesco owns 83%). So successful is it that the company has also sold its services to Kroger a US-based supermarket and general store business that operates over 2,500 outlets that trade under a variety of fascias including Fred Meyer, Kroger and Dillons and also to leading French supermarket operator Groupe Casino.

It has helped Kroger to stage a recovery against Wal-Mart after a long period of losing ground. Unsurprisingly, its smaller scale meant it was unable to fight on an equal footing with Wal-Mart using an EDLP strategy. It has been using Dunnhumby's expertise with customer data to segment
- or tailor - its stores to their specific local markets.

The Kroger chairman and chief executive David Dillon has described the data company as his secret weapon in fighting Wal-Mart: "Dunnhumby has helped me reset my understanding of what the customer is after, and it helps replace intuition with actual data and actual facts. And it's those facts that are driving our decision making."

Dunnhumby analyses the sales data from stores to enable it to construct complex marketing strategies and promotional campaigns. This essential information on actual buying behaviour has guided most of the key decisions taken by the management team at Tesco in recent years (such as the launches of both Tesco.com and its financial services arm, and its entry into non-food categories such as clothing). It will increasingly have the same effect on Kroger and will likely do the same for Casino in the future (the link-up was only announced in October 2006).

What makes is possible to enjoy such customer insight from the data analysis at these retailers are their loyalty schemes through which they are able to collect personal details on their customers and to link this with the purchases that they make in-store. Such loyalty schemes have not been regarded as particularly good ideas to date and Tesco has received much criticism about its loyalty program since its launch in 1995. They were just seen as a cost on a business since they would reduce margin as customers collected points to redeem against goods or money off their shopping bills. David Sainsbury infamously dismissed it as "no better than electronic Green Shield stamps".

But he was to eat his words many times over because since the first customer signed up to the scheme it has provided much of the fuel that has powered Tesco to the top of the UK retailing tree. It is no coincidence that since Tesco launched the scheme it has overtaken Sainsbury's to become, by a long way, the UK's largest retailer.

Within only a few months its impact was obvious. Research showed that customers spent 28% more at Tesco while cutting their spending at Sainsbury's by 16%. This had a major effect on the market shares of the two companies with Sainsbury's having a 19.4% share in January 1995 compared with Tesco on 18.1% but by May of that year the formers share had slipped to 18.8% while the latter had grabbed a 19.4% share. This trend has continued to this day and Tesco now commands a 31.3% share against the 16.5% of Sainsbury's.
From day one Tesco knew that the scheme would provide a whole lot more than simply allowing people to collect loyalty points to reduce their shopping bill. In fact this was never the point of the exercise because the point-accrual mechanism was simply the carrot to customers that would get them to dig out their loyalty cards whenever they visited a Tesco store, thereby enabling Tesco to collect data on them.

But as other retailers launched their own loyalty programs they soon recognised that collecting data is one thing but making sense of it and transforming it into customer intelligence is a completely different matter.

It was an inability to overcome this problem that prompted Sainsbury's (yes it did ultimately launch a loyalty card despite David Sainsbury), Safeway, Somerfield, Asda and Waitrose to abandon their schemes one-by-one.

Just consider that even when Clubcard had a mere five million cardholders, during a three-month trial of the scheme, Tesco had to deal with 50 million shopping trips that comprised 50 billion purchased items. What made the analysis of this data mountain possible was the decision by Dunnhumby to only analyse 10% of the data and then apply the findings back to the other 90%. It realised that even a 10% sample could give 90% accuracy whereas the massively more complex and expensive task of analysing a much larger percentage of data might only deliver 95% certainty so it came to the conclusion that crunching any more than 10% of the numbers was simply not worth the cost or effort.

So powerful were the findings from this trial period that the then Tesco boss Ian MacLaurin said: "You know more about my customers in three months than I know in 30 years." The belief at Tesco was that if Dunnhumby could replicate the success from the trial across the whole business then there was a chance that it could propel the company to become the UK's number one food retailer – displacing Sainsbury's. Since this has come to pass Dunnhumby has played a serious part in customer intelligence creeping up the agenda of an increasing number of retailers. They have come to realise that without sufficient knowledge of their customers' behaviour and buying habits then they are doomed to failure.
A number of years ago I spoke with a former chief executive of Wal-Mart and asked him whether the company – and its UK arm Asda – would be likely to introduce a loyalty scheme to learn more about its customers and he gave a categorical ‘no'. Although he was right and neither company has launched such a scheme this is not to say that they won't in the future. Especially as Wal-Mart will soon find itself competing directly with Tesco on US soil as the UK supermarket will shortly be opening a chain of ‘Fresh & Easy' shops on the West Coast.

Ominously for Wal-Mart, the Tesco boss Sir Terry Leahy recently stated that the company intended to roll out its Clubcard scheme to each of the countries in which it operates thereby throwing up the scenario where Wal-Mart could be facing the might of Tesco's customer insight on its own doorstep.
But even if Wal-Mart resists committing to a scheme there is little doubt that it is increasingly looking to learn more about its customers having recognised that price in no longer the be-all-and-end-all for consumers.

To this end last year it appointed a new head of marketing who had previously spent 19 years at Target – which is recognised as very proficient in targeting segments of customers through focused marketing made possible by customer insight. Target has proved itself particularly adept at extracting more money out of its customers by targeting them more effectively through knowledge of their behaviour, thereby achieving higher profits out of its existing stores. Target's business is regarded as the ‘up market discounter' in the US.

Wal-Mart is now attempting to follow the same path. Its new marketing man has set up a market research and consumer insights competency that is intended to help the company adopt a marketing approach that focuses on specific categories. This will help it to introduce new categories and better tailor the mix of goods in each of its stores so they are better suited to their location and customer bases.

There is evidence that retailers are using various methods to boost their customer knowledge without necessarily running their own loyalty scheme. The multi- retailer loyalty program Nectar is one example of how retailers have been able to increase their customer knowledge without running their own scheme. In the UK Nectar has signed up some serious retail names including Sainsbury's, Debenhams and Dollond & Aitchison but although it provides the mechanism for cardholders to collect and redeem points it is nowhere near as effective at providing customer insight as Dunnhumby is for Tesco and Kroger.

To address the increasing demand for such insight Nectar is now working on creating a data analytics division (a la Dunnhumby) that will enable it to make much better sense of the mass of data that it collects each day on behalf of its retail clients. Tesco has successfully used market intelligence to steal a march on its competitors who are now belatedly waking up to its potential.

By Glynn Davis for The Daily Reckoning. You can read more from Glynn and many others at www.dailyreckoning.co.uk

Editor's note: Glynn Davis is retail and leisure correspondent for The Fleet Street Letter. He also writes for The Grocer magazine, Retail Week and several national newspapers.

Back to top

 
 
Article #3
The Problem with Loyalty Programs
Business Week, By Steve McKee
May 10, 2007
Puzzle
  • The share of a customer's heart is as important as their share of wallet. Steve McKee declares that if loyalty measures behavior, equity measures attitudes. Properly balanced, loyalty should increase equity and equity should drive loyalty. However these are not the same.
  • David Briggs, CEO of American retailing giant QVC, stated “We don't bombard customers with special offer or coupons to build loyalty…we focus on customer communication and satisfaction. For us, it's about building trust and a long-term relationship.
  • There are four basic behaviors of loyal customers: They return for more, they increase their purchases, they bring their friends, and ultimately they invest their valuable time for free.
  • A large majority of loyalty programs believe that if you focus on share of heart, you will get share of wallet. The reverse may not always be true.

Companies measure customer commitment by their transactions.
But that often has little to do with how people genuinely feel about the business
From the earliest days of commerce, merchants have rewarded their most loyal customers with perks—from the baker's dozen to S&H Green Stamps. But in the modern era, customer-loyalty programs become an industry all their own.

We owe that to American Airlines (AMR). Kick-started by the 1981 advent of American's AAdvantage program, total U.S. consumer membership in loyalty-marketing programs today is more than 1 billion strong—an average of more than four programs per adult. Nearly 90% of Americans participate in some type of rewards program, and most are enrolled in more than one.

But are loyalty programs really all they're cracked up to be? Sure, they generate incremental transactions, but what happens to loyalty when the loyalty program stops? Do these programs generate true loyalty or just behavior that looks like loyalty?

It's kind of frightening that we can be reduced as consumers to the sum of what's in our wallet. I emptied my own pocket and found that I carry seven cards from companies that track and reward my purchase behavior.

Fuzzy Picture
I feel genuine loyalty to three of those brands. Two others capture many of my transactions not because of any loyalty I feel but simply because of the benefits they give me. And two I use occasionally because I have a lot invested in them—given the way they've treated me over the years, they actually elicit mild contempt from me each time I do. Not exactly what the loyalty program is designed to generate.

And that's my point: If each of these marketers judged my loyalty strictly by my behavior, they're going to the wrong idea about why I'm loyal. That's the problem with loyalty programs.

Fred Reichheld is an expert on loyalty marketing and the author of The Ultimate Question (Harvard Business School Press, 2006). He cites the example of a grocery store that mistakenly thinks its regular customers are loyal, when in fact they hate the store and shop there only because it's convenient (see BusinessWeek.com, 1/30/06, "Would You Recommend Us?"). Using data alone, he says, "It's hard to tell a good transactional customer from somebody who's a true promoter." He's right.

Matters of the Heart
"Loyalty," as it's defined in practice by loyalty marketing programs, is primarily a measure of behavior—share of wallet, if you will. But making decisions by share of wallet alone is a dangerous game.

Think about a company's most active loyalty marketing program members. It's possible that many of them are the least genuinely "loyal" customers the company has. As the data flows in and the company increasingly tailors the program toward those whose behavior can be bought, it may be neglecting truly loyal customers who don't need to be bribed.

I would like to suggest that at least as important as share of wallet is share of heart, or what might be termed "equity." If loyalty measures behavior, equity measures attitudes. Properly balanced, loyalty should increase equity and equity should drive loyalty. But they're not the same thing.

Loyalty is how I relate to American Airlines and Hilton (HLN). I use both companies frequently, for reasons of calculated benefit more than any long-term affection. In contrast, equity is how I relate to Southwest Airlines (LUV) and Hertz (HTZ)—I would do business with them whether or not they gave me any points or miles. Which two companies are better off with respect to my long-term profitability?

Equity Leaders
Reichheld says there are four basic behaviors of loyal customers: They come back for more, they increase their purchases, they bring their friends, and they invest their precious time for free (see BusinessWeek.com, 8/1/06, "What Not to Do with Net Promoter"). Most loyalty program managers no doubt think their programs pass these four measures. But in my mind, it's those last two words that make all the difference: for free.

Consider your political party. If you're like most people, you've been a member of the same political party for years. You almost always vote for its candidates, you have probably donated money to it, and you may have even volunteered your precious time—yes, for free. Political parties have equity.

Now make a list of your favorite brands. You pay more for them, go out of your way to acquire them, and recommend them to your friends—all for free. Every brand has some level of equity, but some have more than others. And the key to boosting equity is to increase affection—the feeling that drives behavior rather than just the behavior itself.

The Wrong Road
Doug Briggs, former president and CEO of QVC, had the right idea: "We don't bombard customers with special offers or coupons to build loyalty, because it's easy for them to switch to the other guy's coupon. We focus on customer communication and satisfaction. For us, it's about building trust and developing long-term relationships. If QVC has earned a customer's trust, we believe they will buy—over and over again."


I think many companies have gone too far down the road of focusing on loyalty at the expense of equity. Loyalty is admirable, but it can also be a burden. I'm so afraid of forgetting about or losing the rewards I've "earned" that it's just one more burden I have to deal with. But affection is always positive.

If you focus on share of heart, you will get share of wallet. The reverse may not always be true.

Back to top

 
 
Article #4
Loyalty Program Members Shop More, Spend More,
Have More: Study
DIRECT Magazine
Apr 3, 2007 7:37 AM , By Richard H. Levey
Retail
   
A recent study into the shopping habits of loyalty enrolees supports the prominent notion that loyalty program members spend more than their fellow non-member customers.

58% of enrolees from the study group of holiday makers stated that memberships influenced where and how they shopped. Furthermore, the demographics that correlate with higher incomes also link to loyalty program participants.

Loyalty program members accounted for 48 percent of holiday shoppers in 2006. Two-thirds of loyalty members shopped online, and 41 percent ordered from a catalog or through the mail.

Ultimately, loyalty program members are more likely to provide recommendations, especially about programs they do business with.

Retailers sensing that members of their loyalty programs are more valuable customers now have hard facts to back up their gut instincts. According to a survey of holiday spending, participants have more to spend -- and they do spend it.

During the past holiday season, loyalty scheme enrollees spent nearly $1200, or 14% more than other consumers. That is, in part, because they have it: 24% have incomes in excess of $100,000, compared with only 5% of non-enrollees.
But just because they have the higher incomes doesn't mean they are averse to bargains, rewards and other perks: Nearly half of all consumers who earn more than $50,000 "always" or "frequently" used their loyalty cards in conjunction with holiday purchases. Among those who made under $50,000, only 36% used their cards as often.

These programs exert a pull on overall spending. Fifty-eight percent of enrollees said their memberships influenced where they shopped -- and that figure jumped to 62% among those who spent more than $1,000.

Loyalty scheme enrollees shop throughout a number of channels. While nearly half of the non-enrolled consumers did the vast majority of their shopping exclusively in-store, less than one quarter of program participants did so. Two-thirds also shopped online, 41% via the mail (both catalog and direct mail) and one-third made purchases over the phone.

The demographics that correlate with higher incomes also link to loyalty program participants. These consumers are more highly educated, and more are in their peak earning years (between 30 and 60) than their counterparts. And women were much more likely to cite the influence of loyalty programs than men -- 63% of the fair sex indicated enrollment made an impact their purchases, compared with 51% of males.

These results were based on a study of 722 consumers. The study was conducted by Epsilon, a marketing services firm.

Back to top

 

Copyright 1997-2006 Visible Results Limited. All rights reserved.

Click here to view recent Visible Results case studies.

Loyalty Alerts endeavours not to impose corporate censorship on the content reviewed, and all articles featured in the quarterly newsletter will be reproduced in full on the Visible Results website (including full citation of source and author.) In addition, each issue will lead-off with a section that summarizes recent Visible Results related news and press releases.

www.visibleresults.com

This message was sent to %%Email%% because you subscribed to the Visible Results website.
If you don't wish to receive future Loyalty Alerts please click here to unsubscribe

 To ensure delivery to your inbox (not bulk or junk folders), please add
loyalty_alerts@visibleresults.com to your address book.

Send to a Friend
akricker@visible-results.com.au